Science Proves Creation
Jesus Loves me
Evidence in Science that Demands a Verdict
Evolution is a philosophy, NOT a Science
all my origional content on this site
For private non profit use only
.....all for profit rights reserved ......
Truth is not a personal decision. Whether its true to YOU is irrelevant.........Truth, like the law of Gravity, just IS
There are two world views prevelant today. The first world views says “I believe “it” because its True” This has absolute laws of truth, math and physics.
The second world view is “Its true because I believe it”. This second world view has no objective truth in philosophy or science .
The presupposition of evolution violates the most basic laws of Mathematical numbers theory; the law of probabilities; as well as the Second Law of Thermodynamics which is the law of ever increasing chaos in all systems.
This is most evident in the rapid decay of data in ALL information storage systems.
Irreducible Complexity: The Challenge to the Darwinian Evolutionary Explanations of many Biochemical Structures
--Charles Darwin, Origin of Species
With this statement, Charles Darwin provided a criterion by which his theory of evolution could be falsified. The logic was simple: since evolution is a gradual process in which slight modifications produce advantages for survival, it cannot produce complex structures in a short amount of time. It's a step-by-step process which may gradually build up and modify complex structures, but it cannot produce them suddenly.
Darwin, meet Michael Behe, biochemical researcher and professor at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. Michale Behe claims to have shown exactly what Darwin claimed would destroy the theory of evolution, through a concept he calls "irreducible complexity." In simple terms, this idea applies to any system of interacting parts in which the removal of any one part destroys the function of the entire system. An irreducibly complex system, then, requires each and every component to be in place before it will function.
As a simple example of irreducible complexity, Behe presents the humble mousetrap.
It contains five interdependent parts which allow it to catch mice: the wooden platform, the spring, the hammer (the bar which crushes the mouse against the wooden base), the holding bar, and a catch. Each of these components is absolutely essential for the function of the mousetrap. For instance, if you remove the catch, you cannot set the trap and it will never catch mice, no matter how long they may dance over the contraption. Remove the spring, and the hammer will flop uselessly back and forth-certainly not much of a threat to the little rodents. Of course, removal of the holding bar will ensure that the trap never catches anything because there will again be no way to arm the system.
Now, note what this implies: an irreducibly complex system cannot come about in a gradual manner. One cannot begin with a wooden platform and catch a few mice, then add a spring, catching a few more mice than before, etc. No, all the components must be in place before it functions at all. A step-by-step approach to constructing such a system will result in a useless system until all the components have been added. The system requires all the components to be added at the same time, in the right configuration, before it works at all.
How does irreducible complexity apply to biology? Behe notes that early this century, before biologists really understood the cell, they had a very simplistic model of its inner workings. Without the electron microscopes and other advanced techniques that now allow scientists to peer into the inner workings of the cell, it was assumed that the cells was a fairly simple blob of protoplasm. The living cell was a "black box"-something that could be observed to perform various functions while its inner workings were unknown and mysterious. Therefore, it was easy, and justifiable, to assume that the cell was a simple collection of molecules. But not anymore. Technological advances have provided detailed information about the inner workings of the cell. Michael Denton, in his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, states "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10^-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable microminiaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machine built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world." In a word, the cell is complicated. Very complicated.
In fact, Michael Behe asserts that the complicated biological structures in a cell exhibit the exact same irreducible complexity that we saw in the mousetrap example. In other words, they are all-or-nothing: either everything is there and it works, or something is missing and it doesn't work. As we saw before, such a system cannot be constructed in a gradual manner-it simply won't work until all the components are present, and Darwinism has no mechanism for adding all the components at once. Remember, Darwin's mechanism is one of gradual mutations leading to improved fitness and survival. A less-than-complete system of this nature simply will not function, and it certainly won't help the organism to survive. Indeed, having a half-formed and hence non-functional system would actually hinder survival and would be selected against. But Behe is not the only scientist to recognize irreducible complexity in nature. In 1986, Michael J. Katz, in his Templets and the explanation of complex patterns (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986) writes:
"In the natural world, there are many pattern-assembly systems for which there is no simple explanation. There are useful scientific explanations for these complex systems, but the final patterns that they produce are so heterogeneous that they cannot effectively be reduced to smaller or less intricate predecessor components. As I will argue ... these patterns are, in a fundamental sense, irreducibly complex..."
Katz continues that this sort of complexity is found in biology:
"Cells and organisms are quite complex by all pattern criteria. They are built of heterogeneous elements arranged in heterogeneous configurations, and they do not self-assemble. One cannot stir together the parts of a cell or of an organism and spontaneously assemble a neuron or a walrus: to create a cell or an organisms one needs a preexisting cell or a preexisting organism, with its attendant complex templets. A fundamental characteristic of the biological realm is that organisms are complex patterns, and, for its creation, life requires extensive, and essentially maximal, templets."
"The Origin of Information" or how the dna molecule cannot occur by chance.
By Mark Eastman, M.D. and Chuck Missler
"The origin of the genetic code presents formidable unsolved problems. The coded information in he nucleotide sequence is meaningless without the translation machinery, but the specification for his machinery is itself coded in the DNA. Thus without the machinery the information is meaningless, but without the coded information, the machinery cannot be produced. This presents a paradox of the 'chicken and egg' variety, and attempts to solve it have so far been sterile."4
THE scientist who led the team that cracked the human genome is to publish a book explaining why he now believes in the existence of God and is convinced that miracles are real.
Francis Collins, the director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute, claims there is a rational basis for a creator and that scientific discoveries bring man “closer to God”.
In 1981 Sir Fred Hoyle
commented on this appeal to metaphysics:
"I don't know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers [DNA, RNA, proteins] on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the Earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty at understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that this is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The 'others' are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles."18 (Emphasis added)
If we are to assume that the laws of physics and chemistry are essentially uniform throughout the physical universe, then we must logically conclude that life could not have arisen by chance anywhere in the universe.
Even if the laws of physics were found to be more favorable in a distant corner of the universe, there would still be no explanation for the coded information (which does not arise by chance) that is carried by the DNA molecule.
Consequently, the source of the cellular "hardware" as well as the information carried by the DNA molecule must have been an intelligent, extra-dimensional one - beyond the bounds of space and time.
Jesus Loves even me :)
Evidences With Links
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
The experts will say that chaos theory postulating increasing randomness of all systems actually proves Darwinism by aiding in natural selection and evolution word a more complex creature. That is like the analogy that if you plant tons of explosives in a automobile junkyard the result will be hundreds of new cars ready to drive off the lot. The same scientists will also tell you that that their new theory of Punctured Equilibrium causes spontaneous rapid change without leaving any traces of intermediate forms of life. It just comes out of nowhere.
All this evolution theory presupposes that Nature has billions of years in which to evolve life; however there is evidence that states that this is NOT SO.
In our own solar system, for example, the moon is gradually escapeing from the earth. Not too many tens of thousands of years ago it would have been far to close… The magnetic field is decreasing rapidly. Not long ago it would have been to strong for life to exist here. The sun is rapidly shrinking. Not too long ago the Earth would NOT have been in the life habitable zone. Jupiters rings are rapidly looseing cohesion. They MUST have been a recent creation.
According to Boyles law and other laws, None of the theories of stellar, planetary formation make rational or physical sense. There are NO stellar nursereys for example condensing new stars, merely dust clowds occasionally parting showing some stars more clearly. Stars age far more rapidly than is generally believed. The nearby
Sirius system (8 light years) was in ancient times a red star, it is now blueish white. It may in fact be in its final stage before its final expansion and nova with dreadful consequences for life here on earth.
There is sufficient evidence that the very nature of the physical constants of the universe are exactly determined to make life thrive. Even the least deviation of even one of these would make life here impossible. Thus the very exact requirements for life here call out for a designer. Would any of you have the audacity to enter the Louve and insist that the paintings by Renoir, Michelangelo are really painters drop cloths? I think not. The world around us displays the same obvious earmarks of a masterful artist.
Great Videos on the subject !!!
our solar radiation. Sirius is a double star with a All the ancients insist that Sirius was a red Giant star. If this was really true,and they certainly were brilliant people, this leaves us with an interesting question.
This would mean that Sirius had already exhausted its Hydrogen and was now; according to its multicolored (blue- white)spectra, be devouring its final Helium and
This would mean that Sirius MAY nova in the near future!
A Nova might cause Sirius to be brighter than the sun for several months especially if it goes SUPERNOVA greatly increasing white dwarf companion. Supernovas occur (science thinks) when a massive star expels great quantities of its mass which are drawn into a smaller companion and ignited.
Greatly increased solar radiation from a nearby Supernova would cause our own sun to increase its output also, and would "burn men with fire" to quote revelation. The novas shockwave could reach earth in 1000 years, causing our own sun to nova, devouring earth with fire fulfilling Bible prophecy.
Because of this, I think amateurs should keep a log of spectral changes because if Sirius goes back words its final red stage that would mean a possible nova was imminent!!!
Our Moon has craters
by Lewis Brackett Sept 15 2005 on WEDG discussion group
posted here sept 25, 05
when GOD created our moon 6000 years ago it must have been perfect without craters....... but it sure has been walloped since then...... there is little record of impact explosions being seen on the moon anywhere in recorded history after Noah's flood.
this indicates to me that GOD sent a swarm of large chunks of rock through the earth moon system which smashed the ice canopy around the earth with many of these rocks smashed through the earths crust breaking open the underground water chambers where the seas are now, throwing the water high in the atmosphere creating rain.....
this would create mountain forming earthquakes............many of these rocks missed the earth hitting the moon.
I got all this yesterday from thinking about why/how the moon has lots of craters but is only 6000 years old
meteorite activity impacting the moon planets before the flood would have been impossible as it would have destroyed the ice canopy..... major strikes afterward would have lit up the whole night earth, maybe as bright as daylight for a few moments!!! certainly terrifying everyone !!! Had any of these large objects hit the earth in recorded history it would have ended history !!!
New "Drake Equation"
My new version of the "Drake equation" showing the possibilities of another earth in our galaxy!!!
Lets say we start out with 1 billion stars in our galaxy ................
MAYBE 10% are far enough away from each other not to affect each others planets AND to reduce radiation to a tolerable level.....more likely One percent would be 10 million stars
Half are single star systems that leaves 5 million stars
1% are in exactly the right circular orbit to be the right temperature that leaves 50,000 stars
10% are the stars with long term stable energy output that leaves 5000 stars
10% are the proper size leaving 500 stars
10% are the proper type, rocky, atmosphere etc leaving 50 stars with type worlds
Now the chance of one dna strand happening by chance is more that 1 in 10\10th
or 1 in 100 billion....... that leaves you with one "earth" in one billion galaxies
These figures are Very optimistic!!! so you can see that as far as ""evolution "is concerned, we really aren't here :eek: :)
Evidences of Noah's Flood
edited shortened ,from Creation Research Society Quarterly www.icr.org
The River systems of our world have not existed more than 5000 years. By dividing the size (volume) of a river delta by the volume of the annual soil deposits at the river mouths, none of the worlds rivers can be more than 5000 years old The Mississippi Missouri river system is the longest in the world, about 4221 miles. It was first surveyed between 1850-1861 by General Andrew A Humphrey's of the Army corps of Engineers.His finding was that the accumulated soil deposits of the river delta was about 40 feet deep , giving the river an age of about 4620 years, about the time of Noah's flood. The compare able size of the deltas of all other rivers in the world show that they also began at this time. Truly, a person has to be willfully ignorant to ignore this evidenceMan made artifacts burried in solid rock or in coal seams.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE VAST AGE OF OIL?
Oil (formed by fossilized animal matter) and coal (vegetable matter) are said to be millions of years old. But are they? Quite frequently, abnormally high pressures of up to 8,000 psi are encountered in deep
oil wells. Often when a new well is tapped, a gusher goes spouting into the air due to the tremendous pressure trapped below. According to measured values of the permeability of surrounding rock, such pressures would dissipate in thousands, not millions of years. If those oil deposits had been there for more than 5,000 years in some cases there would be no pressure left! Since the pressure is still there (often seeping at the surface), the rock formations containing the oil must be “young”.
Antarctic Ice In 1930, Admiral Richard Byrd established a base in Antarctica. Since that time, the ice has piled higher, so that of his 110 foot radio towers, just a few feet now protrude above the icy surface. At that rate, the ice cover is only 7,000 years old, not a million. But since the build-up must have been more rapid during the 1200ad to 1850ad little Ice Age, it is probably very much younger even than 7,000 years. Ancient maps exist showing Antarctica before the ice came revealing details only recently verified .
Once tropical north pole area before Noahs Flood!
Some more evidence:
June 1st 2006 Network News story tells about core samples from the Artic ocean seabed showing the area was once a tropical swamp!!!
The Eva Creek forest
The Axel Heiberg Island frozen forest
The Ellesmere Island forest
and how about the fresh Dinosaur bones found in Canada also?
A gold necklace was found embedded in a lump of coal. A metal spike was discovered in a silver mine in Peru. An iron implement was found in a Scottish coalbed. Estimated to be millions of years older than man is believed to have existed. A metal, bell-shaped vessel, inlaid with a silver floral design was blasted out of solid rock near Dorchester,Massachusetts .http://www.mm2000.nu/sphinxi.html